MODEL COMPARISON
GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Sunburst
Use Flare to explore ideas quickly and Sunburst when fine detail or consistency across edits matters.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Flare | Sunburst |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Designed for quick iterations | Prioritizes detail over speed |
| Best for | Concept drafts, layouts and social variants | Product visuals, brand assets and detailed edits |
| Quality | Low quality for draft passes | Medium or high quality for finer rendering |
| Edit consistency | Explore different visual directions | Preserve details across revisions |
| Credits | Quoted before submission | Quoted before submission |
1K images and SVGs cost 5 credits each. GIFs and 2K images cost 10 credits each.
OpenAI reports that Flare can produce a low-quality still image in as little as six seconds. Generation time here depends on the request and queue. OpenAI release announcement
When to use Flare
Start with a few drafts to settle the composition, crop and color palette. For a product campaign, compare a close-up, a wider scene and a version with space for a headline.
When to use Sunburst
Once you have chosen a direction, refine details such as the product material, label and lighting. If you edit an existing image, describe what should change and which details to keep.
Frequently asked questions
Is Sunburst always the better choice?
Use Flare when you need to compare several ideas quickly. Use Sunburst when you have a direction and want to refine details such as lighting, textures or product features.
Which model should I use for GIF or SVG?
Choose GIF or SVG first, then check which models are available for that format in the generator. For GIF, review the frame count and duration. For SVG, inspect the shapes at the sizes you intend to use.
What is the difference between quality and complexity?
Quality controls rendering detail. Complexity controls how much planning the model does for the scene or edit. Adjust each setting based on what you want to improve.